Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 vs Roland Rubix 22: Overview of expert opinions

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have 2 inputs and 2 outputs. However, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has hybrid XLR/1/4" TRS jack inputs on the front, while the Roland Rubix 22 has combo XLR/TRS inputs with independent gain knobs and a Hi-Z input for guitars.

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has balanced monitor outputs on the back, while the Roland Rubix 22 has 1/4 inch balanced TRS outputs. Additionally, the Roland Rubix 22 has MIDI in/out ports, very low latency, and compliant drivers, which the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 does not have.

Overall, both interfaces have similar input and output capabilities, but the Roland Rubix 22 offers additional features for musicians who need MIDI connectivity and low latency.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have 2 inputs and 2 outputs, but the types of inputs and outputs differ slightly.

The Scarlett 2i2 has hybrid XLR/1/4" TRS jack inputs, while the Rubix 22 has XLR/TRS combo inputs with phantom power and a Hi-Z input for guitar.

The Scarlett 2i2 has balanced monitor outputs on the back, while the Rubix 22 has balanced TRS outputs for speakers.

Additionally, the Rubix 22 has MIDI in/out ports and a headphone output, which the Scarlett 2i2 does not have.

Overall, both interfaces offer a good range of inputs and outputs for recording and monitoring purposes, but the Rubix 22 may be more versatile for those who need MIDI connectivity or want to record guitar or other high impedance sources.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have similar input and output capabilities, with two combo XLR/1/4 inch inputs and two balanced outputs. However, the Scarlett 2i2 has hybrid XLR/1/4" TRS jack inputs that can receive both line-level and instrument-level signals, while the Rubix 22 has low-noise preamps and phantom power specifically for condenser microphones.

The Scarlett 2i2 also has preamp gain and Air switches, which can add brightness and clarity to recordings. Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 supports a higher sample rate of up to 192 kHz, although this may not be necessary for most recordings.

On the other hand, the Rubix 22 has a headphone output with its own volume control and MIDI input and output ports, which can be useful for musicians who want to connect MIDI instruments or controllers.

Overall, both devices are high-quality audio interfaces that can provide excellent sound quality and functionality for recording and production needs. The choice between the two may come down to personal preference and specific needs, such as whether you need MIDI connectivity or prefer hybrid inputs.

In terms of simultaneous recording and playback, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 seems to be the better option. It has been specifically designed to provide low latency, which means that you can monitor your recordings in real-time without any noticeable delay.

This makes it a great choice for musicians who want to record and play back their performances at the same time. On the other hand, the Roland Rubix 22 may not be the most suitable interface for playing back multiple sources of audio simultaneously, which could limit its usefulness for some users.

However, it should still be possible to record and playback simultaneously with a single source of audio. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces will depend on your specific needs and preferences.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 offer low latency while recording and monitoring. However, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has more specific and detailed information about its latency, with the ability to reduce it even further at higher sample rates.

The Scarlett 2i2 has a round-trip latency of 2. 74ms at 96kHz, which is incredibly low and ideal for recording and monitoring without any noticeable delay. It also has a feature called "Low Latency Mode" which reduces the latency even further to 1. 38ms at 96kHz. This is particularly useful for musicians who need to monitor themselves while recording without any delay.

On the other hand, the Roland Rubix 22 has less specific information about its latency. While it does offer low latency, the exact latency will depend on the specific computer and software being used. This means that it may not be as reliable as the Scarlett 2i2 in terms of latency.

Overall, both interfaces offer low latency and are suitable for recording and monitoring. However, if low latency is a top priority, the Scarlett 2i2 may be the better choice due to its more specific and detailed information about latency and its ability to reduce it even further with Low Latency Mode.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have low latency levels, which is essential for a smooth recording and monitoring process. However, the Scarlett 2i2 has slightly lower latency levels, especially at higher sample rates, which can be beneficial for more demanding recording situations.

Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 has been praised for its low latency while monitoring, which is important for musicians who need to hear themselves in real-time. Overall, both interfaces offer good latency performance, but the Scarlett 2i2 may have a slight edge in this area.

Based on the information provided, it can be concluded that the frequency response range of the preamps in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is 20 Hz - 20 kHz. This means that the preamps are capable of capturing a wide range of frequencies, from the lowest bass notes to the highest treble notes.

On the other hand, the frequency response range of the preamps in the Roland Rubix 22 is unknown. This lack of information makes it difficult to compare the two devices in terms of frequency response range.

However, based on the available information, it can be said that the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has a clear advantage in terms of frequency response range. Not only does it provide a specific range, but it also offers the option to modify the frequency response with the AIR mode feature.

This allows users to enhance the high-end frequencies and add clarity to their recordings.

Overall, the frequency response range is an important factor to consider when choosing an audio interface. The wider the range, the more accurately the preamps can capture the nuances of the sound being recorded. In this case, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 appears to be the better choice for those looking for a device with a wide frequency response range and additional features to enhance their recordings.

In terms of preamps, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have two preamps each. The Scarlett 2i2 preamps are known for producing a clean sound with little coloration, while the Rubix 22 preamps are designed to produce very low noise for clear and defined sound.

The Scarlett 2i2 preamps provide enough gain for solid quality levels, but may not be sufficient for more gain-hungry dynamic microphones. On the other hand, there is no information available on the exact gain and noise levels of the Rubix 22 preamps.

Overall, both interfaces seem to have decent preamps, but the Scarlett 2i2 may be a better choice for those who prioritize clean sound and sufficient gain levels.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have preamps that are capable of providing phantom power for condenser microphones. This means that both interfaces can be used with a wide range of microphones, including those that require phantom power to operate. However, it is worth noting that the quality of the preamps may differ between the two interfaces, which could impact the overall sound quality of recordings.

It is important to consider other factors such as price, connectivity options, and software compatibility when choosing between these two interfaces. For example, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is generally considered to have high-quality preamps and is a popular choice among home recording enthusiasts.

It also comes with a range of software options, including Ableton Live Lite and Pro Tools First, which can be useful for those just starting out with recording. On the other hand, the Roland Rubix 22 may be a better choice for those who need more connectivity options, as it has both MIDI and S/PDIF inputs in addition to its two XLR/TRS combo inputs.

It also comes with a range of software options, including Ableton Live Lite and SONAR LE. Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces will depend on individual needs and preferences. It is important to do research and read reviews before making a decision, as well as considering factors such as budget, intended use, and compatibility with existing equipment.

Based on the available information, it seems that both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have preamps that provide a clean and transparent sound with little distortion and harmonic distortion.

However, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is specifically noted for its low levels of distortion even at high levels, while there is no specific information available about the level of distortion in the Roland Rubix 22 preamps.

Overall, both interfaces are likely to provide high-quality sound with minimal distortion.

Based on the information available, it seems that both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 have high-quality preamps that are designed to capture detailed sound with low noise.

However, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has an upgraded preamp design and a new Air mode that enhances high-end detail, which may give it an edge in terms of preamp quality.

On the other hand, there are no mentions of any additional features or technologies in either interface that affect the quality of the preamps, such as analog modeling or digital processing.

Ultimately, the choice between these two interfaces may come down to personal preference, budget, and specific needs.

In terms of DSP processing, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has a more comprehensive software package that includes various plugins for EQ, compression, reverb, and more. This means that users have access to a wider range of tools to enhance their recordings and achieve the desired sound.

The software package also allows for easy integration with popular DAWs, making it a convenient option for those who use multiple software programs in their workflow.

On the other hand, there is no information available regarding the types of DSP processing available in the Roland Rubix 22. This lack of information may be a concern for users who are looking for specific DSP tools to improve their recordings. Without knowing what types of processing are available, it may be difficult to determine if the Rubix 22 is the right choice for a particular project or recording setup.

Therefore, in terms of DSP processing capabilities, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 seems to be the better option. Its comprehensive software package and range of plugins provide users with a wide range of tools to enhance their recordings and achieve the desired sound. While the Roland Rubix 22 may still be a viable option for some users, the lack of information regarding its DSP processing capabilities may make it a less attractive choice for those who require specific tools to achieve their desired sound.

As there is no information available about the DSP processing in the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, it is difficult to compare it with the Roland Rubix 22. However, based on customer reviews, the Rubix 22 seems to provide clean and clear audio output, which suggests that its DSP processing is of good quality.

It is important to note that DSP processing can affect the overall sound quality of an audio interface, so it is worth considering when comparing these two products. Ultimately, it may be best to try both products out and compare them based on your own personal preferences and needs.

In terms of DSP processing, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 differ significantly. The Scarlett 2i2 does not have any built-in DSP processing, but it allows you to use third-party plugins and software to process your audio signals. On the other hand, there is limited information available about the DSP processing capabilities of the Roland Rubix 22, but it appears that it does not have any built-in effects.

Therefore, if you require extensive DSP processing capabilities, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 may be a better option for you. However, if you don't need DSP processing or are happy to use third-party plugins, both products are suitable for recording and producing music. It ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences.

In terms of DSP processing interface, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 seems to have an advantage over the Roland Rubix 22. This is because the Scarlett 2i2 is known for its high-quality preamps and built-in DSP processing. However, it is important to note that without specific information on the Scarlett 2i2's DSP processing interface, it is difficult to make a direct comparison.

On the other hand, the Roland Rubix 22 may not have a built-in DSP processing interface. However, its interface is highly user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for beginners to use. This can be a significant advantage for those who are just starting out in the world of audio recording and processing.

Ultimately, the choice between these two products may depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user. For those who prioritize high-quality preamps and built-in DSP processing, the Scarlett 2i2 may be the better option. However, for those who value ease of use and a user-friendly interface, the Roland Rubix 22 may be the more suitable choice.

In terms of DSP processing, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers more options with its included software plugins and effects. This means that users can access a range of processing tools directly from the interface, without needing to rely on external plugins or effects within their DAW.

This can be a convenient and efficient way to enhance the sound of recordings, particularly for those who are new to DSP processing.

On the other hand, the Roland Rubix 22 does not have any built-in DSP processing capabilities. This means that users would need to rely on external plugins or effects within their DAW to achieve the desired sound. While this may require a bit more setup and configuration, it can also offer greater flexibility and customization options for more experienced users.

It's worth noting that some users may prefer the simplicity of not having built-in DSP processing and instead using their preferred plugins within their DAW. This can allow for a more streamlined workflow and greater control over the processing chain. Additionally, some users may already have a collection of plugins that they prefer to use, making built-in DSP processing less of a priority.

Ultimately, the choice between these two products may come down to personal preference and specific needs. Those who prioritize built-in DSP processing and a range of included software plugins may prefer the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, while those who prefer a more flexible and customizable approach may prefer the Roland Rubix 22.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 are compatible with Mac and Windows operating systems. However, the installation process for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is slightly more complicated for Windows users as they need to manually install drivers.

In contrast, the Roland Rubix 22 has an easy and self-explanatory installation process for all operating systems. This makes it a more user-friendly option for those who want a hassle-free installation process.

Overall, both audio interfaces are compatible with a range of operating systems. However, if you are a Windows user who wants a straightforward installation process, the Roland Rubix 22 may be the better option. On the other hand, if you are willing to spend a little extra time installing drivers, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is still a great choice.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 are compatible with a wide range of DAWs, including popular options like Ableton Live and Cubase.

However, the Scarlett 2i2 has a slightly wider range of compatibility, including Pro Tools and Logic Pro X. This makes it a better option for those who use these specific DAWs.

Additionally, the Scarlett 2i2 comes with its own software for easy configuration, while the Roland Rubix 22 does not have this feature. This can be a convenient option for those who are new to using audio interfaces and want a simpler setup process.

Overall, both interfaces offer good compatibility with a variety of DAWs. However, the Scarlett 2i2 may be a better option for those who use Pro Tools or Logic Pro X and want a more user-friendly setup process.

In terms of third-party plugin compatibility, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 are similar. They both support a wide range of third-party plugins, but the Scarlett 2i2 comes with its own suite of plugins, which may be an advantage for some users.

The Scarlett 2i2's included plugins can be a great starting point for users who are just getting into music production and don't have a lot of experience with third-party plugins. These plugins are designed to work seamlessly with the interface, and they can help users achieve professional-quality results without having to spend a lot of money on additional plugins.

The Roland Rubix 22, on the other hand, doesn't come with any software interface, so users will have to rely on their DAW's built-in mixer and effects. This can be a disadvantage for users who are looking for a more streamlined workflow, as they will have to spend more time setting up their DAW and configuring their plugins.

However, for users who already have a lot of experience with third-party plugins and prefer to use their own plugins, the Roland Rubix 22 may be a better choice. This interface is designed to work with a wide range of plugins, so users can choose the plugins that best suit their needs and preferences.

Ultimately, the choice between the two interfaces will depend on the user's specific needs and preferences. Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 are high-quality interfaces that offer excellent sound quality and a range of features, so users should carefully consider their options before making a decision.

In terms of compatibility, both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 seem to be reliable and compatible with most software and plugins.

However, it's important to note that the drivers for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 need to be downloaded from a reliable source to avoid any potential issues.

Additionally, it's always recommended to check the product specifications and supported software list before purchasing any audio interface to ensure full compatibility.

Both the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and Roland Rubix 22 are relatively easy to set up and configure with different software and operating systems. The Scarlett 2i2 requires drivers to be installed on a Windows PC, while the Rubix22 is plug-and-play on all systems.

However, both interfaces have intuitive interfaces and are compatible with popular DAWs. This means that users can easily connect their instruments or microphones to the interface and start recording without any hassle. The interfaces also come with software that allows users to adjust the input and output levels, as well as other settings.

Overall, both interfaces are user-friendly and suitable for beginners and experienced recording enthusiasts. They offer high-quality audio recording and playback, and are perfect for home studios or small recording setups. Whether you are a musician, podcaster, or voiceover artist, these interfaces provide a reliable and easy-to-use solution for all your recording needs.

In terms of reputation, Focusrite has a stronger presence in the audio recording industry compared to Roland. Focusrite has been in the industry for over 30 years and has established itself as a reliable and trusted brand for audio interfaces, preamps, and other studio gear.

Its Scarlett series, in particular, has gained a massive following due to its affordability, quality, and ease of use. Focusrite has also collaborated with other industry leaders such as Yamaha and Steinberg, further solidifying its reputation in the industry.

On the other hand, Roland is also a well-known brand in the music industry, but it is more associated with electronic instruments such as synthesizers, drum machines, and digital pianos. Its Rubix line of audio interfaces is relatively new, and it has yet to establish a strong reputation in the audio recording industry.

However, Roland is known for its high-quality products and innovative technology, which could potentially translate to its Rubix line of audio interfaces.

Overall, both Focusrite and Roland Rubix 22 have their strengths and weaknesses, and it ultimately depends on the user's needs and preferences. However, in terms of reputation, Focusrite has a more established presence in the audio recording industry compared to Roland.

Based on the available information, it seems that customers have had negative experiences with the customer support provided by Focusrite for the Scarlett 2i2. On the other hand, there is no specific information available about how customers perceive the customer support provided by Roland Rubix 22.

However, Roland is generally known for producing high-quality products with good customer support. Therefore, it is difficult to make a direct comparison between the two brands in terms of customer support.