Customers like Polar V800 and Polar M400 about the same
At ReviewFinder we prefer to focus on professional product reviews, because customer reviews can be disproportionately affected by unrelated factors such as delivery, specific seller listing problems, and, of course, fake reviews. With that said, below is the summary of consumer sentiment.
Polar V800
CS of 10 is similar to a 4.8 star review, CS of 0 is similar to a 2 star review.
Both Polar V800 and Polar M400 have very similar average customer reviews.
As can be seen in the chart above, median best-selling fitness tracker receives a consumer score of 6.9 (good). Both Polar M400 and Polar V800 receive customer reviews that average out below that median threshold.
Polar M400 | |
Polar V800 | |
Median best-selling Fitness Tracker |
Polar M400 is more popular than Polar V800
It's fairly safe to say that Polar M400 is a more popular fitness tracker than Polar V800, based on its 5,000+ reviews. Popularity is determined based on product sales. Note that older and cheaper products tend to sell more.
To consider
Table: Top compared alternatives for Polar M400 and V800 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Polar M400 | $230 | |||
Garmin Vívosmart 4 | $90 | Cheaper Better Reviews | ||
Withings Steel Hr | $180 | Cheaper Better Reviews |
- GPS WATCH: Built-in GPS technology keeps track of your pace, distance and altitude
- FITNESS TRACKER: Tracks your workouts, steps, distance, calories burned, sleep quality, and activity 24/13
- WATERPROOF FITNESS TRAINER: Use the fitness tracking watch to keep an eye on your running cadence to improve your running efficiency and avoid injuries in all weather conditions
- Read more
- GPS SPORT WATCH: Advanced multisport GPS Watch for serious sports enthusiasts and professional athletes who want to reach peak performance, the built-in GPS keeps track of your ride, run or hike measuring your speed, distance and route
- Read more
- iOS 8.0 or later
- Android 4.3 or later
- Compatible with PC Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, and later
- Compatible with Mac OS X 10.6, OS X 10.7, OS X 10.8, and later
- Compatible with Polar Flow web service
- Compatible with Polar Flow mobile app via Bluetooth Smart
- Walking
- Running
- Walking
- Running
- Cycling
- Swimming
- Stair climbing
- Weight lifting
- General fitness only
The type of display or screen on fitness trackers varies widely by brand and price point—from a few LED lights to full color touchscreens. The main benefit of a screen is being able to read the time and your fitness stats any time of the day without needing to open an app on your phone or plug the tracker into your computer. This could be a positive or negative—some people prefer not to see progress and feel rewarded when they finally look at results and meet their goal. Others need a constant reminder of their status to push them to reach their goals. It’s totally up to you.
Oftentimes, you can also read smartphone notifications on a screen, depending on how advanced the tracker is. Every tracker will differ on what information is shown on the display, whether it’s the time, steps, heart rate, or other goals. Some will be a touchscreen, some will not. These aspects mainly affect ease of use, and will vary in importance by person. Finally, a display will also drain your battery more quickly, and come with a higher price tag.
For fitness trackers, batteries vary widely. Some trackers have rechargeable batteries that last anywhere from hours to days. Others take coin cell batteries like you would find a regular watch, which last a few months to a year. Needing to purchase and replace batteries can be a hassle… but so can plugging in your device every five or so days via USB cable to recharge it. Remembering to take the device off, charge it, and then remembering to put it back on, can seriously interrupt your fitness routine, especially if you’re worried you’ll forget it. Plys, if you want consistent sleep tracking, you don’t want to be charging it overnight. Both options have advantages and disadvantages to keep in mind while you compare options.
- Free web and app services
- Sedentary reminder
- cadence sensor
- speed sensor
- stride sensor
- map view
Polar M400 is a popular option at the top of the price range. It's in the top 3 bestselling fitness trackers and has quite a few popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Garmin Vivoactive 3 or Polar M430 GPS .
Polar M400 was released in 2016. There are quite a few newer fitness trackers on the market. Show newer Fitness Trackers
Polar M400 is $144.91 more expensive than the average fitness tracker ($84.99).
Polar V800 is a well-known and one of the most expensive options. It's in the top 3 bestselling fitness trackers and has many popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Garmin Vivoactive 3 or Polar M430 GPS .
Polar V800 was released in 2015. There are a lot of newer fitness trackers on the market. Show newer Fitness Trackers
Polar V800 is $290.91 more expensive than an average fitness tracker ($84.99).