Expert reviews [14]
Total expert reviews: 14
- with a score: 0
- without a score: 14
The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are ideal for mid to high handicappers who need help getting the ball up in the air. They offer forgiveness and a good feel at impact, but the gun-metal styling combined with the silver face may not hold up over time.
+ pros
- Good feel at impact with a high trajectory and forgiveness for mid to high handicappers.
- Good value for money.
- Definitely worth trying.
- cons
- The gun-metal styling combined with the silver face may fade over time.
Show all 14 reviews
Expert reviews [8]
Total expert reviews: 8
- with a score: 1
- without a score: 7
Highest score by iOver Golf | 98 |
Average score based on 8 reviews | 98 |
Lowest score by iOver Golf | 98 |
Score distribution:
80-100 | |
60-80 | |
40-60 | |
20-40 | |
0-20 |
The TaylorMade M2 irons are designed to help golfers achieve higher and steeper ball flights with a combination of a faster face, stronger lofts, and a lower Centre of Gravity. The M2 Tour version offers a more compact head with better sound and feel, making it suitable for a wider range of golfers.
+ pros
- The M2 irons have a faster face and stronger lofts with a lower Centre of Gravity (CG) to launch the ball higher and land steeper, resulting in improved iron play.
- The M2 Tour version is more compact with a thinner top line and sole, and delivers better sound and feel than the M2.
- The M2 Tour irons have consistent construction throughout and feel better as a result.
- cons
- The M2 irons have a slightly firmer and more hollow sound compared to the AeroBurner at impact.
- The M2 irons compromise on sound and feel, but deliver more performance than the AeroBurner.
Show all 8 reviews
From Seller:
- Maximized distance and trajectory. Optimized look and feel
- A light yet stiff 3D badge design dampens vibration to help produce and maintain exceptional sound and feel
- Our speed pocket and inverted cone technologies provide improved performance on off-center hits to deliver consistent distance
- Read more