TaylorMade Burner 2.0 vs TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons: Overview of expert opinions

The TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 irons are better for mid to high handicappers who prioritize forgiveness and a high ball flight. They are designed for game improvement and are better suited for beginners or high-handicap golfers. The chunkier, more forgiving design with a wider sole and an undercut cavity back provides more forgiveness on off-center hits, making it easier to get the ball in the air and on target.

The Burner 2. 0 is also designed to provide a higher launch angle, which can help golfers achieve greater distance and accuracy. The Burner 2. 0 is ideal for golfers who want to have more control over their club's customization and prefer a wider range of options.

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are better for skilled players who prioritize distance, trajectory control, and forgiveness. It offers more control and precision for better players who want to shape their shots and control their ball flight. Its more compact shape with a smaller club head, thinner topline and sole, and reduced offset allows for more workability and shot shaping.

The fluted hosel and 360-degree undercut design move weight lower and deeper in the clubheads, resulting in a higher ball flight and greater distance. The M2 Tour Irons are ideal for golfers who want to work with a club fitter to find the perfect shaft for their needs. The Thin-Face, Inverted Cone clubfaces technology helps improve distance consistency, and the compact design provides added control.

The Face Slots and Speed Pockets help preserve ball speeds on off-center strikes, making them forgiving on mishits. They are also beneficial for golfers who want to shape their shots and hit different types of shots on the course.

Table of contents (click on an item)

Performance
The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are better for mid to high handicappers who prioritize forgiveness and a high ball flight, while the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are better for skilled players who prioritize distance, trajectory control, and forgiveness.
Click to jump to the Performance comparison
Design
The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 is designed for game improvement, while the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed for better players who want more control and precision in their shots.
Click to jump to the Design comparison
Customization
The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 offers a wider range of shaft options for golfers who want more control over customization, while the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons offer custom shaft options for golfers who want to work with a club fitter to find the perfect fit.
Click to jump to the Customization comparison
Expand Hide

Performance

The TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 irons are better for mid to high handicappers who prioritize forgiveness and a high ball flight. The Inverted Cone Technology and weight distribution improvements make them forgiving on off-center hits and provide consistent distance throughout the bag. They are also beneficial for golfers who struggle to get the ball in the air and carry it further.

The Burner 2. 0 irons are not specifically designed for shot shaping, but they can help improve ball flight.

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are better for skilled players who prioritize distance, trajectory control, and forgiveness. The Thin-Face, Inverted Cone clubfaces technology helps improve distance consistency, and the compact design provides added control. The Face Slots and Speed Pockets help preserve ball speeds on off-center strikes, making them forgiving on mishits.

They are also beneficial for golfers who want to shape their shots and hit different types of shots on the course.

Overall, the Burner 2. 0 irons are better for mid to high handicappers who want forgiveness and a high ball flight, while the M2 Tour Irons are better for skilled players who want distance, trajectory control, and forgiveness. It is important to try out both clubs and see which one feels best and performs best for your individual swing and playing style.

How do the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons compare in terms of overall performance, taking into account distance, accuracy, and forgiveness?

In terms of overall performance, both the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed to improve distance and forgiveness. However, the Burner 2. 0 irons seem to have a more forgiving design, with improvements made to the weight distribution and face thickness to optimize flight and provide added forgiveness.

The Inverted Cone Technology also helps to produce higher ball speeds no matter where impact occurs on the face, resulting in longer distance and a better ball flight. The Vibration Management System also provides a softer and more satisfying feel.

On the other hand, the M2 Tour Irons are designed for distance, height, and forgiveness, with a more compact shape for more trajectory control. The Face Slots and Speed Pockets help to preserve ball speeds on off-center strikes, but some reviewers have noted a lack of feedback when hitting shots.

Overall, both sets of irons have their strengths and weaknesses. The Burner 2. 0 irons may be better for those looking for a more forgiving design, while the M2 Tour Irons may be better for those looking for more trajectory control. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and what the individual golfer is looking for in their irons.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to various product reviews in our database, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are designed to help average golfers improve their distance, ball flight, accuracy, and overall ball striking. The... expand
Based on 11 quotes from 6 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

According to reviews, the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed for distance, height, and forgiveness. They have a more compact shape than the standard M2 irons, allowing for more trajectory control. ... expand
Based on 13 quotes from 6 sources [show quotes and sources]

How do the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons compare in terms of distance on average shots and on mishits?

Both the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed to provide excellent distance on average shots and on mishits. The Burner 2. 0's Inverted Cone Technology allows for higher ball speeds and longer distance even on off-center hits, while the M2 Tour Irons' Thin-Face, Inverted Cone clubfaces technology helps improve distance consistency.

Both sets also have stronger lofts to increase ball speed and lower spin for added distance. However, the Burner 2. 0's distance gaps are consistent throughout the bag and consistently a full club longer than the reviewer's previous set, while the M2 Tour Irons have a more compact design for added trajectory control but are about 5 yards shorter than the M2 Irons.

Overall, both sets are designed to provide excellent distance on average shots and on mishits, but the Burner 2.0 may offer slightly more distance and consistency throughout the bag. The M2 Tour Irons may be a better fit for players looking for added trajectory control and a more compact design.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to the review on checkyourgolf.com, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are designed with "Inverted Cone Technology" that can produce higher ball speeds no matter where impact occurs on the face... expand
Based on 3 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

According to Plugged In Golf and GolfWRX product reviews, the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed to provide excellent distance on average shots as well as on mishits. The Thin-Face, Inverted Cone c... expand
Based on 6 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

Which club, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 or TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons, offers better accuracy on approach shots and off the tee?

Based on the reviews, both the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons offer good accuracy on approach shots and off the tee.

The Burner 2. 0 irons are known for their forgiveness, high ball flight, and improved weight distribution, which could contribute to improved accuracy. These features make them a popular choice for golfers who struggle with consistency and want a club that can help them hit straighter shots. The high ball flight can also be beneficial for golfers who need help getting the ball in the air and carrying it further.

On the other hand, the M2 Tour Irons are designed for more trajectory control and offer a more compact design for added control. These irons are a popular choice for better players who want more control over their shots and prefer a more traditional look at address. The compact design can also be beneficial for golfers who want to shape their shots and hit different types of shots on the course.

However, some reviews suggest that the lack of feedback from the clubface could impact accuracy. Golfers who rely on feedback from their clubs to make adjustments to their swing may find that the M2 Tour Irons don't provide enough information to help them improve their accuracy.

Ultimately, the choice between these two clubs will depend on the individual golfer's preferences and needs. Golfers who want forgiveness and a high ball flight may prefer the Burner 2. 0 irons, while those who want more control and a compact design may prefer the M2 Tour Irons. It's important to try both clubs out and see which one feels best and helps you hit more accurate shots on the course.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to a product review on checkyourgolf.com, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are impressively accurate. The reviewer was impressed with the accuracy of the irons, along with their length and hi... expand
Based on 7 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed to provide more trajectory control than the M2 Irons, according to a review on GolfWRX. However, some reviews suggest that the lack of feedback from the clubf... expand
Based on 6 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

How forgiving are the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons on off-center hits, and which club offers better forgiveness?

Both the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are forgiving on off-center hits, but the M2 Tour Irons offer slightly better forgiveness due to their face slot design. However, it's important to note that the M2 Tour Irons are designed for more skilled players, while the Burner 2.

0 irons are more geared towards mid to high handicappers. Ultimately, the level of forgiveness needed will depend on the player's skill level and personal preferences.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to the product reviews on southamptongolfclub.com and checkyourgolf.com, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are forgiving on off-center hits, with the "Inverted Cone Technology" used in these c... expand
Based on 7 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

According to a product review on Plugged In Golf, the M2 Tour iron is pretty solid in terms of forgiveness and is towards the high end of forgiveness as game improvement clubs go. The club uses Taylor... expand
Based on 6 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

Do the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons have any notable differences in performance on different types of shots, such as fades or draws?

In terms of shot shaping ability, the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons have different focuses. The Burner 2. 0 is not specifically designed for fades or draws, but its Inverted Cone Technology can help with off-center hits and improve ball flight. On the other hand, the M2 Tour Irons prioritize forgiveness and distance, and while it is possible to shape shots with them, they are not designed for it.

This means that golfers who prioritize consistency and distance may prefer the M2 Tour Irons, while those who want more control over their shots may prefer the Burner 2. 0. Ultimately, the choice between these two clubs may come down to personal preference and what aspects of performance are most important to the individual golfer.

Golfers who prioritize forgiveness and distance may prefer the M2 Tour Irons, while those who want more control over their shots may prefer the Burner 2. 0. It is important to try out both clubs and see which one feels best and performs best for your individual swing and playing style.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to the product review on checkyourgolf.com, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Golf Club features "Inverted Cone Technology" that produces higher ball speeds no matter where impact occurs on the face... expand
Based on 2 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed primarily for forgiveness and distance, rather than shot shaping ability. According to Golf Punk, the M2 Tour Irons are designed for forgiveness first, and pa... expand
Based on 11 quotes from 6 sources [show quotes and sources]

Design

The TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 is designed for game improvement and is better suited for beginners or high-handicap golfers. Its chunkier, more forgiving design with a wider sole and an undercut cavity back provides more forgiveness on off-center hits, making it easier to get the ball in the air and on target.

The specific weight distribution in each iron allows for greater precision and control over the ball.

On the other hand, the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are designed to fit the middle ground between a distance iron and a player's iron. It offers more control and precision for better players who want to shape their shots and control their ball flight. Its more compact shape with a smaller club head, thinner topline and sole, and reduced offset allows for more workability and shot shaping.

The fluted hosel and 360-degree undercut design move weight lower and deeper in the clubheads, resulting in a higher ball flight and greater distance.

In summary, the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 is better for beginners or high-handicap golfers who need assistance with their game, while the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are better for better players who want more control and precision in their shots.

How does the clubhead size of the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 compare to that of the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons?

Based on the available information, it appears that the clubhead size of the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 is larger than that of the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons. The Burner 2. 0 has a measured clubhead size of 200cc, which appears even larger due to its address footprint. On the other hand, the exact size of the M2 Tour Irons' clubhead is not specified, but it is noted to be smaller than the standard M2 Irons.

Therefore, if clubhead size is a significant factor for a golfer, they may prefer the Burner 2. 0 over the M2 Tour Irons.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to a product review on golftipsmag.com, the clubhead of the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 is measured at 200cc, but it looks to be about 50cc larger due to its "large address footprint."
Based on 5 quotes from 5 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons have a smaller clubhead compared to the standard M2 Irons, according to the product review on GNN. However, the exact size of the clubhead is not specified in any of the r... expand
Based on 5 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

In terms of shape, how do the two clubs differ from each other?

The main difference in shape between the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons is significant. The Burner 2. 0 has a chunkier, more forgiving design with a wider sole and an undercut cavity back. This design is intended to help golfers who need assistance with their game.

The wider sole and cavity back provide more forgiveness on off-center hits, making it easier to get the ball in the air and on target.

On the other hand, the M2 Tour has a more compact shape with a smaller club head, thinner topline and sole, and reduced offset. This design is intended to provide more control and precision for better players. The smaller club head and thinner topline and sole allow for more workability and shot shaping, while the reduced offset helps to promote a more penetrating ball flight.

Overall, the Burner 2. 0 is designed for game improvement, while the M2 Tour is designed to fit the middle ground between a distance iron and a player's iron. The Burner 2. 0 is more forgiving and easier to hit, making it a great choice for beginners or high-handicap golfers. The M2 Tour offers more control and precision for better players who want to shape their shots and control their ball flight.

In conclusion, the main difference in shape between the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons is significant. The Burner 2. 0 is more forgiving and easier to hit, while the M2 Tour offers more control and precision for better players. Both clubs have their strengths and weaknesses, and golfers should choose the one that best fits their game and skill level.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons have a chunky design with a wide sole and an undercut cavity back, which is typical of game improvement irons. The head design is quite forgiving and has a big offset, ... expand
Based on 3 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons have a more compact shape compared to the standard M2 irons. They have a smaller club head, thinner topline and sole, and reduced offset. According to Golf Punk, the M2 To... expand
Based on 4 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

How does the weight distribution of the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 compare to that of the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons?

Both the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons have weight distribution improvements that aim to optimize ball flight and distance. However, the methods used to achieve this are different.

The Burner 2. 0 uses specific weight distribution in each iron. This means that each iron has a unique weight distribution that is designed to enhance its performance. The weight is distributed in such a way that it optimizes the ball flight and distance for each iron. This approach allows for greater precision and control over the ball.

On the other hand, the M2 Tour Irons use a fluted hosel and a 360-degree undercut design to move weight lower and deeper in the clubheads. This design allows for a lower center of gravity, which helps to increase launch angle and reduce spin. The result is a higher ball flight and greater distance.

In addition to the weight distribution improvements, the M2 Tour Irons have a smaller clubhead, thinner top line and sole, and reduced curvature of the leading edge and offset. These design features help to improve the overall performance of the club by increasing speed and reducing drag.

Overall, the weight distribution improvements in both sets of irons are designed to enhance performance, but the specific techniques used differ. The Burner 2. 0 uses specific weight distribution in each iron, while the M2 Tour Irons use a fluted hosel and a 360-degree undercut design to move weight lower and deeper in the clubheads.

Both approaches have their advantages and are designed to help golfers improve their game.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

According to a review on GolfMonthly, weight distribution has been improved throughout the set to optimize flight. Each iron has been engineered with a specific weight distribution in order to improve... expand
Based on 4 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

The TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons use TaylorMade’s new Fluted hosels, which allowed 3 grams of weight to be moved lower and deeper in the clubheads and improves their feel. A new 360-degree undercut design... expand
Based on 10 quotes from 5 sources [show quotes and sources]

Customization

The TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 is better for customization options as it offers a wider range of shaft options, including both steel and graphite. This gives golfers more flexibility in choosing the right shaft for their swing and playing style. The Burner 2. 0 is ideal for golfers who want to have more control over their club's customization and prefer a wider range of options.

On the other hand, the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons are better for golfers who want custom shaft options. While the M2 Tour Irons only come with the True Temper XP95 steel shaft as the stock option, they offer additional custom shaft options. This means that golfers can work with a club fitter to find the perfect shaft for their needs, even if it is not one of the stock options.

The M2 Tour Irons are ideal for golfers who want to work with a club fitter to find the perfect shaft for their needs.

What are the available shaft options for the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons golf clubs?

The TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 offers a wider range of shaft options compared to the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons. The Burner 2. 0 has eight different shaft options, including both steel and graphite. This gives golfers more flexibility in choosing the right shaft for their swing and playing style.

On the other hand, the M2 Tour Irons only come with the True Temper XP95 steel shaft as the stock option. While this may limit the options for some golfers, it is still a high-quality shaft that is designed to provide consistent performance.

However, the M2 Tour Irons do offer additional custom shaft options. This means that golfers can work with a club fitter to find the perfect shaft for their needs, even if it is not one of the stock options.

Ultimately, the choice between the Burner 2. 0 and the M2 Tour Irons will depend on the golfer's preference and needs in terms of shaft material and weight. Some golfers may prefer the wider range of options offered by the Burner 2. 0, while others may be satisfied with the custom options available for the M2 Tour Irons.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons are available in eight different shaft options including Superfast steel and graphite and Project X. According to a product review on golfmonthly.com. Another product r... expand
Based on 3 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

According to Golf Punk, the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons come with the True Temper XP95 steel shaft as the stock option, but there are also additional custom shaft options available.
Based on 4 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]

Are there any differences in the grip choices?

Based on the information available, there is no clear difference in grip choices between the TaylorMade Burner 2. 0 and TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons. Both sets offer a variety of custom shaft options, which may include different grip choices. It's important to check with a retailer or the manufacturer directly to find out more about available grip options for each set.

TaylorMade Burner 2.0

I'm sorry, I don't have information on available grip choices for the TaylorMade Burner 2.0. However, based on the product review on Golf Monthly, the irons are available in eight different shaft opti... expand
Based on 2 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons

According to the information available in ReviewFinder database, there is no specific information regarding grip choices for the TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons. However, as they have numerous custom shaft o... expand
Based on 3 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]
Expert Reviews There are people on the Internet whose job is to review products. Below are their opinions.

Expert reviews [14]

No critic scores
Total expert reviews: 14
  • with a score: 0
  • without a score: 14

Expert reviews [8]

98
Total expert reviews: 8
  • with a score: 1
  • without a score: 7

Score distribution:

80-100
60-80
40-60
20-40
0-20
From Seller:
  • 360 degree Undercut moves CG lower, allows for more ball speed across the face
  • Speed Pocket increases launch angle and ball speed, improving forgiveness for shots struck below the center of the face
  • Sound Management System: A light and stiff cavity badge system that manages sound and eliminates unwanted vibrations for superior sound and feel
  • Read more
Loading price comparison chart...

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons is a well-known and one of the most expensive options. It's in the top 3 bestselling golf clubs and has dozens of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Callaway Steelhead XR or Cobra King F6 Iron Set .

TaylorMade M2 Tour Irons is $400.78 more expensive than an average golf club ($500).

You might also like:

High-rated Golf Clubs in a similar price range.

This website displays data from third party public sources. The data presented is for information purposes only. We can't guarantee correctness and completeness of all the data presented here, and therefore will not accept liability for any issues arising from usage of this data. All Trademarks and Copyrights belong to their respective owners. ReviewFinder is reader-supported - if you click on a link on ReviewFinder and make a purchase, we earn a commission at no extra cost to you.


Copyright © 2024