M-Audio BX5 vs Presonus Eris E5: Overview of expert opinions

The Presonus Eris E5 is better suited for those who prioritize a more balanced and accurate sound quality, need to hear every detail in their music, and work in medium-sized studios or professional setups. It has a wider frequency response range, making it a better option for those who need a more detailed mid-range and high-end.

It performs better on speaker stands and isolation pads, making it a great option for those who want a more professional setup.

The M-Audio BX5 Carbon studio monitor is better for those who work in smaller rooms and are more budget-conscious. It has a higher total wattage output and maximum SPL than the Presonus Eris E5, making it better suited for larger studio spaces or for those who require louder sound levels.

It has a defined bass sound that is very deep, making it a better option for those who need a deeper bass response and accurate reproduction of low frequencies. It is also better for accurate reproduction of low frequencies, while the Eris E5 is not designed for very low bass frequencies.

Table of contents (click on an item)

Power
The M-Audio BX5 is better suited for larger studio spaces and bass-heavy music genres, while the Presonus Eris E5 may be better for smaller spaces and a more balanced sound quality.
Click to jump to the Power comparison
Sound
Compared the sound quality of _ENTITY1_ and _ENTITY2_, including frequency response, clarity, and accuracy
The Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 are both accurate and clear in sound reproduction, with the Eris E5 having a wider frequency response range and the BX5 having a defined bass sound that is very deep.
Click to jump to the Sound comparison
Size
The Presonus Eris E5 is larger and better suited for medium-sized studios and professional setups, while the M-Audio BX5 is more compact and affordable, making it better for smaller rooms and budget-conscious users.
Click to jump to the Size comparison
Expand Hide

Power

The M-Audio BX5 has a higher total wattage output and maximum SPL than the Presonus Eris E5, making it better suited for larger studio spaces or for those who require louder sound levels. It may also be better for those who work with bass-heavy music genres, as it has a slightly lower frequency response range than the Presonus Eris E5.

However, the Presonus Eris E5 may be better for those who work in smaller studio spaces or who prioritize a more balanced and accurate sound quality. It also has a slightly wider frequency response range, making it better for those who work with a variety of music genres. Ultimately, the choice between these two studio monitors will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

What is the wattage output of the M-Audio BX5 and Presonus Eris E5?

In terms of wattage output, the M-Audio BX5 has a higher total wattage output of 70 watts compared to the Presonus Eris E5's 50 watts per speaker. However, it's important to note that wattage output is not the only factor to consider when comparing studio monitors. Other factors such as frequency response, sound quality, and overall performance should also be taken into account.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 Studio Monitor produces 50 watts per speaker, according to a product review on Music Radar.
Based on 3 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

The M-Audio BX5 has two built-in amplifiers: a 40-watt unit for the 5-inch woven Kevlar woofer and a 30-watt for the 1-inch silk dome tweeter. So the total wattage output of the speaker is 70 watts.
Based on 1 quotes from 1 sources [show quotes and sources]

What is the maximum SPL (sound pressure level) of the M-Audio BX5 and Presonus Eris E5?

The M-Audio BX5 has a higher maximum SPL than the Presonus Eris E5, with a difference of 8 decibels. This means that the M-Audio BX5 can produce louder sound levels than the Presonus Eris E5.

However, it is important to note that listening to sound levels above 85 decibels for extended periods of time can cause hearing damage. Therefore, it is recommended to use caution when using either of these monitors at high volumes.

It is important to prioritize your hearing health when using any audio equipment. While the M-Audio BX5 may be capable of producing louder sound levels, it is not worth risking your hearing to achieve this. Always use caution and listen at safe levels to protect your hearing.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 has a maximum SPL of 102 decibels, according to reviews on gemtracks.com, synapticsound.com, and Hollagully.
Based on 4 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

The M-Audio BX5 Studio Monitor has a maximum SPL (sound pressure level) of 110 dB, according to a product review on Old Time Music.
Based on 1 quotes from 1 sources [show quotes and sources]

Sound

The Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 are both known for their accuracy and clarity in sound reproduction, with a flat and neutral frequency response. The Eris E5 has a wider frequency response range, making it a better option for those who need a more detailed mid-range and high-end.

On the other hand, the BX5 has a defined bass sound that is very deep, making it a better option for those who need a deeper bass response. The BX5 is also better for accurate reproduction of low frequencies, while the Eris E5 is not designed for very low bass frequencies. Overall, the Eris E5 is a great option for those who need to hear every detail in their music, while the BX5 is better for those who need a deeper bass response and accurate reproduction of low frequencies.

Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and specific needs.

In terms of clarity, which of the two monitors provides a more accurate representation of the audio being played?

Both the Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 are known for their accuracy and clarity in sound reproduction. They both have a flat and neutral frequency response, which is critical for a good studio monitor. The Eris E5 has a frequency response range of 53Hz – 22kHz, while the BX5 has a range of 56Hz – 22kHz.

The Eris E5 has a slightly wider frequency response range, but both monitors provide a consistent frequency response even during broad changes to the master volume.

In terms of bass response, the M-Audio BX5 has a defined bass sound that is very deep, while the Eris E5 has a slightly weaker bass response. However, the Eris E5 has a more detailed mid-range and high-end, which makes it a great option for those who need to hear every detail in their music.

Overall, both monitors provide accurate and dependable audio, but the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and specific needs. The M-Audio BX5 may be a better option for those who need a deeper bass response, while the Presonus Eris E5 may be a better option for those who need a more detailed mid-range and high-end.

Presonus Eris E5

Yes, according to expert reviews on Audio Stance, soundref.com, Hollagully, Hord Inc Studios, and perfectacoustic.co.uk, the Presonus Eris E5 provides a clear and accurate representation of the audio ... expand
Based on 7 quotes from 6 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

Yes, according to multiple product reviews, including those on PCMag, Old Time Music, and CNET, the M-Audio BX5 delivers accurate and dependable audio with a flat-response style sound signature that g... expand
Based on 7 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

How do the monitors differ in terms of accuracy when it comes to reproducing low frequencies?

In terms of accuracy when it comes to reproducing low frequencies, the M-Audio BX5 appears to have an advantage over the Presonus Eris E5. The BX5 is capable of reproducing intense sub-bass frequencies accurately, as noted in the PCMag review. On the other hand, the Eris E5 is not designed to reproduce very low bass frequencies accurately, as it is meant for small spaces where too much bass would be detrimental to the sound.

The frequency range of the Eris E5 only goes as low as 53Hz, which is quite common for studio monitors with a driver of this size. Therefore, if accurate reproduction of low frequencies is a priority, the M-Audio BX5 may be a better choice.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 is designed for small spaces, where too much bass would be detrimental to the sound. Therefore, the Eris E5 monitors are not meant to reproduce very low bass frequencies accuratel... expand
Based on 10 quotes from 5 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

According to the product review on PCMag, the M-Audio BX5 Carbon delivers laudable bass response on tracks with intense sub-bass presence like The Knife's "Silent Shout". The review also states that t... expand
Based on 3 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

Are there any notable differences in the soundstage or stereo imaging between the two monitors?

Based on the information available, it is difficult to make a direct comparison between the two monitors in terms of soundstage and stereo imaging.

However, it is worth noting that both monitors are generally well-regarded for their overall sound quality and accuracy, which are important factors in creating a good soundstage and stereo image.

Ultimately, the best way to determine which monitor is right for you would be to listen to both and compare them in person.

Presonus Eris E5

None of the reviews in the ReviewFinder database specifically mention the soundstage or stereo imaging of the Presonus Eris E5 monitor.
Based on 10 quotes from 7 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

I'm sorry, we don't have specific information on the soundstage or stereo imaging of the M-Audio BX5 monitor from our database of expert reviews.
Based on 2 quotes from 1 sources [show quotes and sources]

Size

The Presonus Eris E5 is slightly larger than the M-Audio BX5, with dimensions of 10. 24” x 7” x 7. 68” compared to the BX5's 10” x 7” x 8”. The Eris E5 is suitable for medium-sized studios and performs better on speaker stands and isolation pads, making it a great option for those who want a more professional setup or who want to get the most out of their studio monitors.

On the other hand, the M-Audio BX5 Carbon studio monitor was designed for use in smaller rooms and is a more compact and affordable option. While the size of the workspace is subjective and depends on the user's preferences and needs, the Presonus Eris E5 is better for larger spaces and professional setups, while the M-Audio BX5 is better for smaller rooms and more budget-conscious users.

What are the physical dimensions of the M-Audio BX5 and Presonus Eris E5?

The Presonus Eris E5 is slightly taller and deeper than the M-Audio BX5, but has the same width. The Eris E5 measures 10.24” x 7” x 7.68”, while the BX5 measures 10” x 7” x 8”.

The difference in depth may affect placement options for the monitors, but overall the size difference is minimal.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 Studio Monitor has a height of 10.24” (260 mm), a width of 7” (178 mm), and a depth of 7.68” (195 mm), according to a product review on soundref.com.
Based on 8 quotes from 5 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

According to a product review on CNET, the M-Audio BX5 Studio Monitor measures 10x7x8 inches.
Based on 1 quotes from 1 sources [show quotes and sources]

Are there any notable differences in weight between the two monitors?

Based on the information provided, the M-Audio BX5 is slightly heavier than the Presonus Eris E5, with each speaker weighing 11 pounds compared to the Eris E5's 10.2 pounds.

While this difference may not be significant for some users, it could be a consideration for those who need to transport or move their monitors frequently.

However, it's important to note that weight is just one factor to consider when comparing studio monitors, and other features such as sound quality, frequency response, and connectivity options should also be taken into account.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 Studio Monitor weighs 10.2 lbs (4.63 kg), according to a verified product review on soundref.com and gemtracks.com.
Based on 3 quotes from 2 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

Each M-Audio BX5 speaker weighs 11 pounds, according to a CNET product review.
Based on 1 quotes from 1 sources [show quotes and sources]

How do the physical dimensions of each monitor affect their sound quality?

In terms of physical dimensions, the Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 have different designs. The Eris E5 is slightly larger than the BX5, with dimensions of 7 x 10. 24 x 7. 68 inches, while the BX5 measures 7. 7 x 6. 9 x 10 inches. However, as mentioned earlier, the size of the monitors is not a significant factor in determining their sound quality.

Both monitors have different cabinet designs that affect their sound quality. The Presonus Eris E5 has a front-firing bass port, which allows for better low-frequency response. The cabinet is made of vinyl-laminated MDF, which helps to reduce resonance and improve sound quality.

On the other hand, the M-Audio BX5 has a rear-firing bass port, which can cause issues if the speaker is placed too close to a wall. The cabinet is made of vinyl-laminated MDF with a unique baffle design that helps to reduce diffraction and improve sound quality.

Overall, while the physical dimensions of the monitors may have some impact on their sound quality, it is not the most critical factor. The design of the cabinet, driver size, and tuning are more important in determining the sound quality of the monitors. Both the Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 have unique designs that prioritize audio performance over appearance.

Presonus Eris E5

There is no significant correlation between the physical dimensions of the Presonus Eris E5 and its sound quality. The size of the monitors is not an accurate indicator of their sound quality. Instead... expand
Based on 11 quotes from 9 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

According to the review on WireRealm, the physical dimensions of the M-Audio BX5 Carbon are compact, making it easier to properly position the speaker for optimal sound quality. Additionally, the Audi... expand
Based on 6 quotes from 4 sources [show quotes and sources]

Which size would be more suitable for a smaller or larger workspace?

Both the Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 are suitable for smaller workspaces, but the Presonus Eris E5 performs better on speaker stands and isolation pads, which can help to improve the overall sound quality. This makes it a great option for those who are looking for a more professional setup, or who want to get the most out of their studio monitors.

On the other hand, the M-Audio BX5 Carbon studio monitor was designed for use in smaller rooms. It is a more compact option that is ideal for those who have limited space, or who are looking for a more affordable option. Ultimately, it is important to consider the size of your workspace and your specific needs when choosing between these two options.

Both the Presonus Eris E5 and M-Audio BX5 are great choices for those who are looking for high-quality studio monitors, but they each have their own strengths and weaknesses that should be taken into account.

Presonus Eris E5

The Presonus Eris E5 is suitable for small to medium-sized studios according to product reviews on Home DJ Studio, gemtracks.com, synapticsound.com, and soundref.com. It is compact enough to fit on a ... expand
Based on 7 quotes from 5 sources [show quotes and sources]

M-Audio BX5

The M-Audio BX5 Carbon studio monitor was designed for use in smaller rooms, according to AudioRumble's product review. However, the exact size of the workspace is subjective and depends on the user's... expand
Based on 5 quotes from 3 sources [show quotes and sources]

Experts recommend Presonus Eris E5 more than M-Audio BX5

As of 2 Apr 2024, experts prefer Presonus Eris E5 over M-Audio BX5, but both Studio Monitors have solid expert endorsements.

As per this month's meta ranking, Presonus Eris E5 received 2 recommendations: from woodandfirestudio.com (14 Nov 2023) and Hyperbits. By contrast, M-Audio BX5 received only 1 recommendation from PianoDreamers (22 Jan 2024).

Rank Change Price Studio Monitor
Pocket-lint
E-Home Recording Studio
woodandfirestudio.com
Popular Science
Hyperbits
Gearank
Careers In Music
Music Radar
PianoDreamers
Music Critic
16
-1 $120
Presonus Eris E5
-
-
9
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
39
N/A Check price
M-Audio BX5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-

Curious to see this month's entire Studio Monitors ranking? It's here

About our ranking methodology

Endorsement summary:

  • On 22 Jan 2024 PianoDreamers ranked M-Audio BX5 as #7
    Rank Studio Monitor Comment
    ... ... ...
    #7 out of 10 M-Audio BX5
    Best Studio Monitor Under $500 (for intermediate studios)
    ... ... ...
  • On 14 Nov 2023 woodandfirestudio.com ranked Presonus Eris E5 as #9
    Rank Studio Monitor Comment
    ... ... ...
    #9 out of 10 Presonus Eris E5
    The best studio monitors for beginners
    ... ... ...
  • Hyperbits ranked Presonus Eris E5 as #3
    Rank Studio Monitor Comment
    ... ... ...
    #3 out of 20 Presonus Eris E5
    Best Entry Level Monitors (less than $400/pair)
    ... ... ...

After counting and adding up the 100 expert endorsements of the April rankings, Presonus Eris E5 outranks M-Audio BX5. This is not to say that M-Audio BX5 is a bad option. Like Presonus Eris E5, it is recommended by experts, but less.

Critic Consensus Common points from expert reviews summarized.
As can be seen below, Presonus Eris E5 is mentioned by key experts in Apr 2024, while M-Audio BX5 is not.
Rank Change Price Studio Monitor
Pocket-lint
E-Home Recording Studio
woodandfirestudio.com
Popular Science
Hyperbits
Gearank
Careers In Music
Music Radar
PianoDreamers
Music Critic
1
- $399
Yamaha HS8
-
3
2
-
6
9
-
-
-
1
2
- $720
Neumann KH 120 A
-
6
1
-
-
12
4
-
-
2
3
+4 $129
JBL 305P MkII
-
-
-
6
1
5
-
6
5
-
4
- $159
KRK Rokit 5 G4
-
1
-
-
2
3
-
-
6
-
Show all rows
Expert Reviews There are people on the Internet whose job is to review products. Below are their opinions.

Expert reviews [6]

88
Total expert reviews: 6
  • with a score: 4
  • without a score: 2
Highest score by Old Time Music
98
Average score based on 6 reviews
88
Lowest score by PCMag
80

Score distribution:

80-100
60-80
40-60
20-40
0-20

Expert reviews [23]

92
Total expert reviews: 23
  • with a score: 4
  • without a score: 19
Highest score by whippedcreamsounds.com
100
Average score based on 23 reviews
92
Lowest score by GuitarFella
86

Score distribution:

80-100
60-80
40-60
20-40
0-20
From Seller:
  • Authentic, flat frequency response in a compact footprint
  • 5" woven Kevlar low-frequency driver
  • New, bi-amplified 70 Watt (40+30) Class A/B amplification
  • Acoustic Space Control lets you calibrate the BX5 to your mixing environment
  • Read more
From Seller:
  • An outstanding way to upgrade your monitoring so that your mixes translate.
  • Now comes included with Studio One Prime and Studio Magic plug-in suite, over $1000 USD worth of music production software.
  • 5.25-inch woven composite woofer delivers solid low-end sound with minimal bass distortion.
  • Read more
From Manufacturer Manufacturer-provided product description, urls and documents.
EAN Numbers: 0694318016435
UPC Numbers: 694318016435
EAN Numbers: 0600599647930, 0632317252003, 0658700915652, 0673454002175, 0673454002199, 0673454002212
UPC Numbers: 600599647930, 632317252003, 658700915652, 673454002175, 673454002199, 673454002212
Loading price comparison chart...

M-Audio BX5 is a well-known option on the lower end of the price range. It's in the top 3 bestselling studio monitors and has dozens of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Rockville Apm6 6.5" or Pioneer DM-40 .

M-Audio BX5 is $100 cheaper than the average studio monitor ($249.99).

Presonus Eris E5 is a very popular and one of the cheapest options. It's in the top 3 bestselling studio monitors and has dozens of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Mackie CR3-XBT or Mackie CR4BT .

Presonus Eris E5 is $130 less expensive than an average studio monitor ($249.99).

You might also like:

High-rated Studio Monitors in a similar price range.

This website displays data from third party public sources. The data presented is for information purposes only. We can't guarantee correctness and completeness of all the data presented here, and therefore will not accept liability for any issues arising from usage of this data. All Trademarks and Copyrights belong to their respective owners. ReviewFinder is reader-supported - if you click on a link on ReviewFinder and make a purchase, we earn a commission at no extra cost to you.


Copyright © 2024