Sennheiser RS 175 vs Sennheiser RS 195: Overview of expert opinions
The Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for those who prioritize deep and punchy bass and want a more dynamic and impactful sound experience. They offer a rich and immersive listening experience with a focus on bass impact and clarity in the mid-range and treble frequencies. They are suitable for genres that benefit from powerful bass, such as rock and electronic music.
The RS 195 headphones also excel in noise cancellation in the mid-range, speech intelligibility enhancement, and customizable hearing boost presets. They have a longer battery life and better overall durability. Additionally, they provide excellent comfort for extended use.
On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 headphones are better for those who prefer a more balanced sound signature and want a slightly bass-heavy response. They provide tight and not overpowering bass that does not drown out the vocals, making them suitable for genres where a balanced sound is desired, such as classical and jazz music.
The RS 175 headphones offer passive noise isolation through their closed-back design, making them suitable for watching movies and TV shows without bothering others. They have a slightly shorter battery life but offer the flexibility of using non-rechargeable batteries for immediate use. The RS 175 headphones are also more adjustable to different head sizes and shapes.
In summary, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for those who prioritize deep and punchy bass, noise cancellation, customizable hearing boost, longer battery life, and overall durability. They are suitable for genres such as rock and electronic music. On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones are better for those who prefer a more balanced sound signature, passive noise isolation, adjustability, and the flexibility of using non-rechargeable batteries.
They are suitable for genres such as classical and jazz music.
Table of contents (click on an item)
Sound quality
Based on the expert reviews, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for those who prioritize deep and punchy bass and want a more dynamic and impactful sound experience. The RS 195 headphones offer a rich and immersive listening experience with a focus on bass impact and clarity in the mid-range and treble frequencies.
They are suitable for genres that benefit from powerful bass, such as rock and electronic music.
On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 headphones are better for those who prefer a more balanced sound signature and want a slightly bass-heavy response. The RS 175 headphones provide tight and not overpowering bass that does not drown out the vocals. They are suitable for genres where a balanced sound is desired, such as classical and jazz music.
In terms of treble frequencies, the RS 195 headphones offer a warm and organic treble that is clear and detailed without being harsh or overly bright. This makes them suitable for genres that require smooth and pleasant treble, such as acoustic and vocal-focused music.
The RS 175 headphones have a more exciting and pronounced treble response, which enhances the immersive experience when watching movies or listening to music. They are suitable for genres that benefit from energetic and immersive treble, such as action movies and electronic music.
Both the RS 195 and RS 175 headphones offer good overall clarity, but the RS 195 may have a slight edge with its exceptional midrange and treble performance. This makes them suitable for genres that require transparency and detailed reproduction, such as classical and instrumental music.
Overall, the RS 195 headphones are better for those who prioritize deep and punchy bass and want a more dynamic and impactful sound experience, while the RS 175 headphones are better for those who prefer a more balanced sound signature and want a slightly bass-heavy response. The specific use cases where each product excels include genres such as rock and electronic music for the RS 195, and classical and jazz music for the RS 175.
Noise cancellation
The Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for noise cancellation in the mid-range, as they achieve above average isolation and reduce treble noise by about 30dB. They also have an additional noise suppression mode that enhances speech intelligibility, making them suitable for situations where clear communication is important.
Additionally, the RS 195 headphones have selectable hearing boost presets, which can improve certain frequencies, making them ideal for individuals with specific hearing needs.
On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 headphones provide passive noise isolation through their closed-back design. While they do not have active noise cancellation, they can block out some ambient noise, making them suitable for watching movies and TV shows without bothering others.
However, it's important to note that they do not completely eliminate all external noise like active noise-canceling headphones do.
In terms of sound quality, the RS 195 headphones are known for their exceptional sound reproduction and dynamic sound character, with deep bass, detailed mid-range, and warm treble. They are designed to deliver excellent sound quality without the need for active noise cancellation.
On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones are praised for their closed-back design, which helps to block out ambient noise and provide passive noise isolation.
Both the RS 195 and RS 175 headphones have similar battery life, with the RS 195 lasting up to 19-20 hours and the RS 175 lasting up to 18 hours. However, it's important to note that these estimates may vary depending on factors such as the usage of noise cancellation and the volume levels at which the headphones are used.
In summary, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for noise cancellation in the mid-range, speech intelligibility enhancement, and customizable hearing boost presets. They are also known for their exceptional sound quality. On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones provide passive noise isolation through their closed-back design, making them suitable for watching movies and TV shows.
Both headphones have similar battery life.
Comfort
Based on the expert reviews, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for extended use comfort. They have an adjustable headband and comfortable ear cups that provide a snug fit, and no discomfort or soreness was reported after prolonged use. The RS 195 headphones also have better padding on the ear cups and headband compared to the RS 175 headphones, offering a more comfortable experience.
On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones may be more suitable for those who prioritize adjustability to different head sizes and shapes. They have an adjustable headband that allows for a perfect fit, and the plush ear covers provide a comfortable and secure fit. While they may cause slight soreness after prolonged use, they still offer a comfortable fit initially.
In summary, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for extended use comfort and have better padding, while the RS 175 headphones excel in adjusting to different head sizes and shapes. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the user's specific needs and preferences.
Battery life
Based on the expert reviews, the Sennheiser RS 195 is better for those who require a slightly longer battery life. With approximately 19-20 hours of battery life on a single charge, it is suitable for extended listening sessions or binge-watching sessions without needing to be recharged.
This makes it ideal for individuals who prefer longer periods of uninterrupted use.
On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 offers up to 18 hours of battery life, which is still quite impressive. It is also worth noting that the RS 175 headphones provide the option to use non-rechargeable batteries, which eliminates the need for charging altogether. This feature may be beneficial for users who prefer the convenience of simply replacing batteries when needed, without the wait time for recharging.
In summary, the Sennheiser RS 195 is better for those who prioritize longer battery life and uninterrupted use, while the RS 175 offers the flexibility of using non-rechargeable batteries for immediate use. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Connectivity
Based on the expert reviews, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for connectivity in terms of range. They use a 2. 4 GHz RF signal for wireless audio transmission and have a transmission range of up to 330 feet (100 meters) in line of sight. This makes them ideal for users who want to enjoy their music without worrying about tangled cords and who want the freedom to move around the room without the sound cutting out.
On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 headphones are better for connectivity in terms of compatibility with devices. While they also use a wireless transmitter for connectivity, they have a slightly shorter transmission range of up to 100 meters (328 feet) in line of sight. However, they can be used with smartphones, tablets, and laptops, but they require the use of a docking station to transmit audio from the device to the headphones.
In terms of specific use cases, the RS 195 headphones would be better for users who prioritize range and freedom of movement. They are suitable for users who want to listen to music or audio from their audio source without being restricted by cords and who want the ability to move around a larger space.
On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones would be better for users who prioritize compatibility with devices. They are suitable for users who want to connect their headphones to smartphones, tablets, and laptops and who are willing to use a docking station for the wireless transmission.
Overall, both headphones offer wireless connectivity, but the RS 195 headphones are better for range and freedom of movement, while the RS 175 headphones are better for compatibility with devices.
Durability
Based on the expert reviews, the Sennheiser RS 195 headphones are better for durability in terms of their overall build quality and sturdiness. They have a sleek design with denser ear cups and a solid construction, making them more resistant to damage from accidental drops. The RS 195 headphones would be a good choice for users who prioritize durability and want headphones that can withstand regular use without easily breaking or cracking.
On the other hand, the RS 175 headphones have a decently sturdy build quality but with lower grade plastic for the ear cups. While they still have a moderately flexible headband reinforced with a thin metal frame, the plastic material used for the ear cups may feel cheap and less durable. The RS 175 headphones may be suitable for users who are more careful with their headphones and prioritize other features over durability.
Overall, the RS 195 headphones are better suited for users who want headphones with a sleek design, denser ear cups, and a solid construction that can withstand regular use without easily breaking or cracking. The RS 175 headphones, while still decently sturdy, may be more suitable for users who prioritize other features and are more careful with their headphones to avoid potential damage.
Neither Sennheiser RS 175 nor Sennheiser RS 195 were recommended by experts this month
On 20 Nov 2024 (13 days ago) we went through 97 Headphones expert endorsements , however neither Sennheiser RS 175 nor Sennheiser RS 195 were included in any of those recommendations. Since neither Headphones received a single endorsement, as far as expert recommendations go, it's technically a tie. We do, however, recommend taking a look at Sony WH-1000XM5 or other critically acclaimed Wireless Headphones of this month.
For reference, Sony WH-1000XM5 received 9 endorsements this month, from IGN (17 May 2024), Tom's Guide (15 Oct 2024) What Hi-Fi (11 Nov 2024) and 6 others.
Rank | Change | Price | Headphones | IGN | Tom's Guide | What Hi-Fi | Digital Trends | WIRED | CNET | Wirecutter | PCMag | T3 | Rtings.com |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
- | $298 | Sony WH-1000XM5 The Sony WH-1000XM5 headphones have received positive reviews for their sound quality, noise cancellation, comfort, battery life, connectivity, and durability, making them a top choice for users seeking a premium listening experience. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | - |
N/A | N/A | $173 | Sennheiser RS 175 | - |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N/A | N/A | $550 | Sennheiser RS 195 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Curious to see this month's entire Wireless Headphones ranking? It's here
Rank | Change | Price | Headphones | IGN | Tom's Guide | What Hi-Fi | Digital Trends | WIRED | CNET | Wirecutter | PCMag | T3 | Rtings.com |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | $298 | Sony WH-1000XM5 The Sony WH-1000XM5 headphones have received positive reviews for their sound quality, noise cancellation, comfort, battery life, connectivity, and durability, making them a top choice for users seeking a premium listening experience.
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | - |
2 | - | $329 | Bose QuietComfort Ultra The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones have received positive reviews for their sound quality, noise cancellation, comfort, battery life, and connectivity, making them a recommended choice for those seeking a versatile and enjoyable listening experience. | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 3 | 1 | 1 |
3 | - | $400 | Apple AirPods Max The Apple AirPods Max receive positive reviews for their sound quality, noise cancellation, comfort, battery life, and connectivity, making them a top choice for an outstanding audio experience. | 8 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | - | 9 | 8 | - |
4 | - | $229 | Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds are highly praised for their sound quality, noise cancellation, comfort, battery life, connectivity, and durability, making them a recommended choice for music enthusiasts who value strong bass and treble, effective noise cancellation, comfort for extended use, and durability for various activities. | - | - | - | - | 3 | 11 | - | 2 | 3 | - |
Show all rows |
Expert reviews [12]
- with a score: 2
- without a score: 10
Highest score by PCMag | 80 |
Average score based on 12 reviews | 80 |
Lowest score by HomeTheater Review | 80 |
Score distribution:
80-100 | |
60-80 | |
40-60 | |
20-40 | |
0-20 |
- Comfortable fit and low latency for watching movies.
- Good sound quality for watching movies, with a better treble response.
- Decent line-of-sight range and easy-to-use controls for office use.
- Similar design and build quality as the RS 165.
- Longer continuous battery life compared to other TV headphones.
- Not versatile enough for all environments and situations, limited to indoor use in direct line-of-sight of the transmitter.
- Sound quality is not as good for critical listening, with a bit too much bass and a lack of mid-range.
- Not suitable for commuting, traveling, or sports.
- Limited controls, no call/music functions.
- Bulky and not portable, does not fold into a more compact format.
- Sturdy build quality but not as durable as other headphones in its price range.
- Not stable for physical activity, ear cups sway a lot.
- Poor consistency in bass range performance.
- Passive isolation and significant leakage.
- Long charge time for rechargeable batteries.
- The Sennheiser RS 175 has a powerful sound signature with bright highs and rich lows, as well as the ability to add more bass.
- The headphones have a dedicated recharging stand and transmitter that accepts both analog and digital inputs from home theater components.
- The wireless transmission quality is nearly flawless, with a range of approximately 330 feet and minimal disruptions.
- The headband's padding can exert too much pressure on the head over long listening periods.
- The cradle/transmitter is lightweight and easy to knock over.
- The surround mode can make dialogue sound unnatural and should be left off.
Expert reviews [4]
- with a score: 0
- without a score: 4
- Better build quality: The RS 195 has a more premium feel and is less likely to get damaged.
- Slightly better sound: The headphones have a better mid-range and the ability to customize the bass to suit personal preferences.
- Greater wireless range: The headphones have a longer range for wireless connectivity.
- Additional features on the stand: The stand has extra dials for balance and switching between personal hearing profiles.
- Worse overall performance than previous models: The RS 195 performs worse than the RS 165 and RS 175 in terms of sound, isolation, and latency.
- Unjustified asking price: The price of the RS 195 is not justified considering its performance compared to previous models.
- Not ideal for neutral listening: The bass-oriented sound and subpar soundstage make the RS 195 less suitable for neutral listening.
- Not suitable for commuting or traveling: The headphones require the transmitter to be in range, limiting their use to home or office settings.
- Not intended for sports: The headphones are bulky, unstable, and have a fixed transmitter, making them unsuitable for physical activities.
- Average for office use: While they have a decent range and are comfortable, they are leaky and do not provide enough isolation for noisy office environments.
- Limited controls: The headphones do not have the ability to take calls or play/pause music, limiting their functionality.
- Not portable: The headphones are large, do not fold, and require the stand to function, making them impractical for carrying around.
- Not stable: The headphones are heavy and sway during physical activity, making them unstable for sports.
- Poor consistency: The bass performance varies significantly and the treble range is inconsistent.
- Poor isolation: The headphones do not block much noise in the bass range and have a high amount of self-noise.
- Long charge time: It takes more than 8 hours for the headphones to fully charge.
- Convenient and easy to use, especially for general entertainment purposes.
- Offers different sound modes, including a speech mode, which is ideal for those with hearing issues or for focusing on speech-oriented tracks.
- Good noise exclusion properties, making it suitable for use in noisy environments.
- Wireless design allows for freedom of movement and eliminates the need for long cables.
- Comfortable to wear, regardless of head size or shape.
- Sound quality is good but not exceptional, especially compared to wired headphones.
- Not suitable for audiophile use.
- Relatively high price point at £350.
- Compact, ergonomic over-ear headphones. Connectivity Technology: Wireless.Frequency response 17 - 22,000 Hz.Specific uses for product : Communication.Transducer principle : Dynamic, Closed. Carrier frequency : 2.4 – 2.48 GHz.
- Read more
- Closed, circumaural headphones with excellent digital wireless audio transmission
- Exceptional digital audio clarity and transmission range of up to 328ft/100m (line of sight)
- Multi-purpose transmitter - also functions as 'easy-charge' cradle and docking station
- Read more